AIGA Design for Democracy: Election Design : community
|Click on the images to study them|
Activities + Place + People = Community
For our work, community can be de.ned as the sum of the activities, places, and people involved in election process. Our program is designed to improve the lives of all who come in contact with the tasks, environments, and exchange of participatory democracy. It is our intent to in.uence the design of election materials and processes on a national scale. As we continue our work, the prototypes developed from 2000-04 are to be made available as models for improvement for local, national, and internation-al election authorities.
Activities: Design of things the voter sees and does
In November 2000, 111 million people cast ballots in the U.S. general election, yet 186 million were eligible to vote. Our program for encouraging participation includes a vote! logo designed to symbolize the con.dence, pride, dedication, enthusiasm, duty, and sense of community that represents participation in democratic process. Our contribu-tion to AIGA Get Out The Vote is designed to reach voters who may be disenfranchised by language or cultural barriers.
Ballot design reform is where we began, and it remains the core of our election design initiative. We have established basic guidelines for increased clarity and legibility, and have begun to address the legal and procedural changes that will be necessary for signi.cant improvement.
Place: Design for the environment the voter experiences
The Polling Place is a temporary, often confusing, environment. Most polling places are in neighborhood locations: school auditoriums, church basements, of.ce building entryways — spaces that were not designed for the purpose of conducting an election. Our work addresses the temporary nature of the environment by providing signs that clearly identify way.nding, information, instruction and services.
People: Design for those with whom the voter interacts
Those who serve in the polling place have direct in.uence on the voter’s experience. They also impact the ef.ciency of election administration. Our work provides detailed guidelines for page layout and content management of a pollworker training and reference manual including templates for electronic training support.
The forms, envelopes, and instructions used for election record keeping and vote re-cording can be very confusing for pollworkers. Design for Democracy has developed a document management system that includes large reference numbers, consistent placement of information, clear instructions, and a color coding system that provides instant, useful information.
Directors: Marcia Lausen, Information Design - Cheyenne Medina, Graphic Design - Stephen Melamed, Industrial Design - Elizabeth (Dori) Tunstall, Research - Clients: David Orr, Cook County Clerk - John Lindback, Director of Elections, State of Oregon - Design Professionals: Veronica Belszuarri - Thomas Brandenberg - Hillary Geller - Gus Granger - Meeyoung Melamed - Gretchen Schulfer - Jennifer Snyder - Matthew Terdich - Bob Zeni - Reseach Professionals: User-research by Sapient, Inc. experience modeling group: - Joan Afton - Anna Choi - Martha Cotton - Elizabeth (Dori) Tunstall - Rob Vellinga - Todd Cherkasky - - Research volunteers for UIC student teams: - Tamara Hamlish - Brianna Sylver - Frank Romagosa - UIC Student Design team: Graphic Design Industrial Design - for Cook County: for Cook County: - Veronica Belszuarri Susan Bullis - Katie Boston Olivier Currant - Thomas Brandenberg Jay Demerit - Carrie Butera Randy Estiller - Lydia Cervantes Justin Geagan - Sandra Champion Tim Jones - Claudio Fucarino Brian Mak - Matt Granstrom David Sagan - Sabine Krauss Ronaldo Santiago - Alice Leaf Joe Schifano - Vedran Residbegovic Brian Urbanik - Jennifer Stratton Marcus Wolff - Matthew Terdich - Arlene Torman - So.a Vaitsas - Joanna Wilkiewicz - The State of Oregon: Disenfranchised Voters: - Manyi Au Kelly Bullard - Nolan Chan Lenka Cechova - Citlali Diaz Vincent Cerasani - Lizelle Din Tricia Fleischer - Abrahem Hasan Luz Hernandez Nieto - Tamara Hastings Christy Claire Katien - Jacqueline Howard Benjamin Kim - Luis Ibarra Karen Liwanpo - Dawn Joseph Brian Mak - Stephanie Klayman Sasa Matijevic - ` Laura Martinez Martha Maxwell - Gretchen Schulfer Jennifer Murfay - Jennifer Snyder Kimberly Murfay - Kristin Tobin Jose Ruiz - Ya-Yu Tseng Lesa Sewick - Noah Weinstein Charles Sherman - Michelle Tan -
In the U.S. election of November 2000, a poorly designed ballot provided an unexpected and unprecedented opportunity to act as the catalyst for change in the design of election materials. Taking advantage of this opportunity, a multi-disciplinary class at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) worked in collaboration with AIGA and election of.cials in two states to improve the American voting experience.
To ensure that each eligible citizen is informed about their rights and responsibilities.
Programs and literature used to recruit pollworkers and educate young voters.
Posters designed to reach Asian-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Polish-Americans, Puerto Ricans, and other potentially disenfranchised communities.
To ensure that each eligible citizen can make an informed decision about issues and candidates. Voter education literature, state and county voter information websites provide information in the way voters wish to receive it — organized into categories of learn, serve, register, and vote.
To ensure, as much as possible, that each eligible citizen is registered to vote once and only once. Voter Registration Card design makes information clear and accessible to voters while addressing new election code compliance issues.
To make sue that eligible citizens can exercise their right to choose.
Prototype designs for punchcard and optical scan ballots respect existing technologies and introduce user friendly layouts with clear information, and greater legibility. Electronic voting interface provides the .rst professionally designed interactive demo for electronic voting.
Information + Navigation
Polling place set-up: guidelines for improved space management and .ow
Informational signage; indicated by blue color provides useful information
Instruction signage: indicated by red color provides process demonstration
Way.nding: signs to help voters .nd their way.
Pollworker Station Trays: save time and provide information
Voting Supply Carrier: improved handling and organization of materials/set-up
Voting booth design improved technology and privacy
Universal Voting booth: for both seated and standing voters
Tools for disabled voters: for greater access
Pollworker Training + Recruitment
Election Judge Manual: reorganized and clari.ed content and established graphic standards with simpli.ed drawings and navigational aids.
Electronic Training Support: presentation in alignment with the Election Judge Manual that is used in the day-long training session for all who serve in the 2,500 polling places in suburban cook count.
Administrative forms + envelopes system revolutionized behind-the-scenes adminis-tration by clarifying procedures and decreasing the possibility for error.
None that we know of
Research reports that informed our work:
Disenfranchised by Design: Voting Systems and the Election Process
Susan Roth King
To Assure Pride and Con.dence in the Electoral Process
The National Commission on Federal Election Reform
Deadlock: The Inside Story of America’s Closest Election
Series of articles from The Washington Post.
Improving the usability and Accessibitly of Voting Systems and Products
NIST Special Publication 500-256
Sharon Laskowski, Marguerite Autry, John Cugini, William Killam,
and James Yen
Voting: What Is, What Could Be.
MIT CalTech Voting Technology Project
Observational Field Research
Researchers go to relevant environments, often without
recording equipment and “get a feel for” the objects, people,
interactions and language associated with a topic.
Cook County township election, March 2001
Elizabeth Tunstall, Ph.D., Sapient, Inc.
Oregon Vote-by-Mail Postal Processing Center, X 2002
Marcia Lausen and UIC Students
DuPage County general election, November 2004
Elizabeth Tunstall, Ph.D.
Interviews include both dialogues and activities that are conducted in context. Researchers talk with participants about general issues important to the
project (open-ended questions, not questionnaires), and often incorporate exercises, such as tours, card sorts, mapping activities, task analysis and
inventories to complement this reported information.
Cook County Voters and Election Judges, March 2001
Elizabeth Tunstall, Ph.D., Sapient, Inc.
Cook County Election Of.cials, March 2001
Marcia Lausen and UIC students
State of Oregon Election Of.cials, X 2002
Marcia Lausen and UIC Students
A self-documentary technique to that allows participants to frame
their experience in response to a protocol. Participants are given
disposable cameras and asked to capture aspects of an experience
on .lm and annotate each photo in a logbook.
Oregon Vote-by-Mail Voters (9)
https://www.AIGA Design for Democracy.aiga.org